Recently it has got to the point where it can easily make the NSLU2 and the QuickCam 9000 work together to make a high-resolution IP camera server, for a total of NZ$275. Despite the name it has proved to be quite reliable and full-featured, although not terribly well documented, as it is constantly being worked on and improved. I have been working on combining these two devices with one of the open-source firmwares that has the rather disconcerting name of OpenWRT Kamikaze.
#Firewall openwrt dockstar pro
The Logitech Quickcam Pro 9000 is a good example of a UVC camera, capable of up to 1600×1200 pixels complete with optics to match.
#Firewall openwrt dockstar drivers
This standard, known as the USB Video Class or UVC, means that newer webcams no longer require proprietary drivers but will work with a generic UVC driver. A number of new webcams with true resolutions greater than 1 megapixel have appeared, and a standard for USB web cameras has finally been agreed on. Webcams have also made some interesting strides forward recently. Including acting as a camera server for an attached webcam. The really interesting thing about it is that the open source community has developed something like five alternative firmware distributions for it which are very capable, and can do almost anything that the hardware will allow. Not much by todays standards, but not very many years ago those would have been respectable specs for a desktop. Its a complete computer with a 266MHz RISC CPU, 8M of flash and 32M of RAM, two USB ports, and an RJ-45 connector. Some sort of premium seems to go on anything connected with the security industry.Īs an illustration of this, the Linksys NSLU2 is a little network storage controller which does web and file serving. For example, the wireless D-Link DCS5300 sells for NZ$930 and it only does 320×240 pixels.Īfter all, IP cameras have a processor in them, and do web serving, and that… well, that really isn’t a reason for them to be expensive. A low-end one like the LevelOne FCS1030 is NZ$260, and they go a lot more expensive than that. IP-based cameras that connect to a LAN via an RJ45 connector or wirelessly over 802.11 are quite a bit more useful, because they can be put almost anywhere, but they tend to cost a surprising amount and not provide much resolution. They can be good or bad depending on how much money you want to spend, but there is one almost-universal rule, which is that they connect to a host PC over USB. Web cams are fairly ubiquitous things these days and by no means expensive.
0 kommentar(er)
